Politics of an embryo

I’ve been following with interest – and contributing to (despite one or two formatting issues that led to inadvertent re-posting of the not entirely duplicate comment) – the thread (from which one fairly argued comment has been inexplicably removed) following the news story in last week’s Nature (3 Nov’ ‘11) – ’Mississippi to vote on ’personhood’.

Initiative 26 – ‘the Personhood amendment’ – was put to state ballot as follows:

Should the term “person” be defined to include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the equivalent thereof?

It’s a strange one, isn’t it? It assumes of Mississippians (at least) three things:

  • That they are already conversant with an erstwhile agreed definition of ‘person’
  • That they are aware of the ‘moment of fertilisation’
  • That they understand what ‘cloning’ means

Today, we learn that Initiative 26 has been defeated. Fortunately, it seems that the people of Mississippi are more nuanced than its politicians courting their votes.

Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s